Talk:Oujda

Morocco Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help expand the project:

You can help! يمكنكم أن تساهموا

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mounir Charïbi
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Morocco articles and Unknown-importance Morocco-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to articles in Category:Morocco articles missing geocoordinate data
Photo : See requested photographs in Morocco
Stubs : Morocco stubs
Other :
- Translate from Arabic: Sellam Ameziane, Mrebih Rebbu

Untitled

The most recent change reads as if there were half a million residents in the 10th century. I doubt if that's correct, but could someone help me to be sure? RickK 23:18, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Oujda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.alarab.co.uk/Previouspages/Alarab%20Weekly/2007/07/07-14/w32.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/678NyvGs8?url=http://www.lavieeco.com/documents_officiels/Recensement%20population.pdf to http://www.lavieeco.com/documents_officiels/Recensement%20population.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gharnati

@R Prazeres Hi,

As I said, my addition are sourced and cannot be considered as POV and you cannot just revert without providing a source that says otherwise. In addition, the information added are quite the same from those already mentioned in the article Gharnati. It's an historical reality that the Gharnati is originating from Tlemcen before being spread to Morocco in the last century by Algerian families. In a paragraph specific to Gharnati it's not possible to not mention those information.

@Mr Bitton Please join the discussion if you are interested in the subject. Descartes16 (talk) 10:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've revised again ([1]) per what the sources cited actually say. All the other details you've added are either irrelevant (it's not known as "Sana'" in Morocco) or unsupported by the sources you cited (while the Tilimsani families moving to Oujda seems likely, none of the sources you cited actually state this). The previous text from my edit ([2]) already clearly indicated its base was in Tlemcen before Morocco — even though all the other sources you added ([3], [4], [5]) actually don't specify Tlemcen narrowly, interestingly — so this complaint is all the more undue, since the main point you seem concerned about is already present.

In sum: you're dumping details that repeat emphasis on Tlemcen multiple times, despite this being an article about Oujda, while the sources cited support none of the specific details you're inserting. If you cannot agree with the current text, then per WP:STATUSQUO we will revert to the older version before either of our edits until there's a consensus otherwise, though that would be a shame in my opinion. R Prazeres (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]